What’s your VM chargeback model?

Over the past few years our organization has been tried to adopt a pricing model for providing virtual machines. We are a small college with several semi-independent units to support. We need to be able to quickly quote, chargeback, and fulfill our incoming requests.

This is a very big update to the post I made in December 2009 entitled VMware Expert System with PowerCLI and Excel. Problem 1: Solved. Problem 2: In progress…

The VMware Expert System has changed significantly. Here’s a summary of the changes:

  • Added deployment via PowerCLI and the OSCustomizationSpec/OSCustomizationNicMapping in PowerCLI 4.0 Update 1
  • Completely rewritten its capacity gathering functionality using SQL queries instead of PowerCLI
  • Added chargeback functionality
  • Made a pretty invoice system

It’s not quite ready for posting… but here’s a sneak preview:

1 – Entering in the systems basic requirements (similar to the expert system screenshots) Users can only select guest OSes with a corresponding template that has been created and maintained by our team.

2 – Viewing the quote/invoice. After this step, the document printed as a PDF and sent to the requesting department.

3 – After departmental approval, the deployment details are opened and more specifics are added

It is important to note that this sheet is pretty flexible. It supports up to 4 vNICs, and 60 disks across any datastore that is available to vCenter. Capacity for each disk is checked before allowing a deployment. The templates we use only have one vNIC and virtual hard disk, so the additional required ones are added after deployment. DEPLOY VIRTUAL MACHINE fires off PowerCLI script with the appropriate parameters to make the deployment happen, validates them, and deploys the VM.

4- Cost data. We had to decide how many vCPUs we would be able to get per CPU.  After that, it became a cost accounting exercise. Another important note: we built this to be the full capacity of the two UCS chassis purchased, even though our initial outlay was 8 B200s spread out over two chassis.   We broke our costs down per GB RAM, GB SAN storage, vCPU, and applied fixed VMware Licensing/support and UCS support costs.

I plan to release the spreadsheet, its underlying VBA source code and the PowerCLI in the coming weeks. I’m particularly interested in other chargeback models for similarly sized and positioned organizations.

Higher Ed: Virtualizing Banner Unified Digital Campus with VMware

Banner Unified Digital Campus (Banner UDC) is the most used administrative suite of applications specific to higher education. A specially crafted Google search shows almost 30,000 different universities running Banner UDC!

If you are wondering if Banner UDC can be virtualized the answer is YES. VMware’s website has very little information about virtualizing Banner UDC… there’ just info about virtualizing Banner Xtender, the integrated document imaging solution. Many sysadmins will have difficulty finding a definitive answer to the “Are we supported on VMware?”  question.

Get an account with the Sungard Commons and Sungard Connect and see for yourself. You’ll find Sungard has this to say in FAQ 1-44BOB8:

Banner UDC clients can realize significant cost benefits through the use of virtualization technologies.  Virtualization allows for server consolidation, with potential savings in hardware acquisition and maintenance, operating costs, and administrative time. Virtualization can also play an important role in High Availability and Disaster Recovery strategies. Banner UDC applications are supported with two software solutions, Sun Solaris Containers and VMware ESX Server. Also supported are hardware partitions offered by Solaris Logical Domains (LDoms), HP-UX Virtual Partitions (vPars),  and AIX Logical Partitions (LPARs).  Virtualization is a very dynamic field and additional solutions will be supported in accordance with market demand.

The SunGard Higher Education Support Center will not require clients to replicate every Banner UDC issue in a native supported environment. If we have reason to believe that virtualization is part of the problem, we may ask clients to independently verify that the problem exists in a native environment.  We will also work with virtualization vendors to jointly diagnose and resolve issues. The Support Center is not able to accept virtual images from clients to use as debugging aids. Such images may contain software for which SunGard Higher Education is not licensed.

The note specifically says the Banner Database server is not recommended on vSphere, citing Metalink 249212.1. Google it for yourself: we have found that the Oracle support is just perpetuating fear, uncertainty, and doubt.  Aside from Google, another good place to research is  Sungard’s BORACLE mailing list (customers only) – you’ll find there are several Banner UDC customers large and small running their full suite (including the database) VMware vSphere with no issues.

The support note also mentions ‘Other Third-Party Products’. Many Banner UDC clients use Cognos for reporting/BI. IBM offers Cognos support on VMware. There’s also Luminis, the most popular web portal with Banner UDC, which is also supported as a virtual machine. For more information, see documents titled “Luminis Platform 5” and “Luminis Platform Virtualization”.

As for our organization, we have been running a couple of parts of the Banner UDC install in virtual machines from the beginning: eVisions Intellecheck and Banner ePrint have given zero problems with regard to virtualization.

Our journey to full suite virtualization started out by performing a large Banner UDC upgrade (Banner 7 to Banner 8) with vSphere. The testing of the upgrade was successful (and so the real upgrade) AND we obtained Oracle DBA buy-in to running Banner UDC on virtual machines.

Since then, the staging environment’s application and database servers are on virtual machines and no one’s noticed.  Once the staging environment pilot is done, the next step is to work toward moving our production servers to vSphere.

PowerCLI: nSeries Guest OS Timeout Scripts

First post in months. Hopefully I’ll have more to post on in the next few weeks. Onto more pressing issues…

“The N Series VMware ESX Host Utilities” have a couple of ISOs that have scripts for tweaking the guest OS disk timeouts.

From the IBM Redbook IBM System Storage N series and VMware vSphere Storage Best Practices:

This is a job for PowerCLI. Inspired from Jase’s script.

Considerations for Linux: Use an account that can do passwordless sudo (or root- you don’t have to have root SSH enabled for Invoke-VMscript).

# Requires VMware Tools to be installed on each guest.
$winisoName = "[datastore] path/to/windows_gos_timeout.iso"
$linisoName = "[datastore] path/to/linux_gos_timeout.iso"
# Get Windows Guest Credentials
Write-Host "Enter Windows Credentials"
$wincred = Get-Credential
# Get Linux Guest Credentials
Write-Host "Enter Linux Credentials"
$lincred = Get-Credential
# Get ESX Host Creds
Write-Host "Enter ESX  Credentials"
$esxcred = Get-Credential
# Get ALL VMs
$vms = Get-VM
foreach($vms as $vm){
	$driveName = "CD/DVD Drive 1"
	$vm = $vm | Get-View
	$dev = $vm.Config.Hardware.Device | where {$_.DeviceInfo.Label -eq $driveName}

	$spec = New-Object VMware.Vim.VirtualMachineConfigSpec
	$spec.deviceChange = New-Object VMware.Vim.VirtualDeviceConfigSpec[] (1)
	$spec.deviceChange[0] = New-Object VMware.Vim.VirtualDeviceConfigSpec
	$spec.deviceChange[0].operation = "edit"
	$spec.deviceChange[0].device = $dev
	$spec.deviceChange[0].device.backing = New-Object VMware.Vim.VirtualCdromIsoBackingInfo
	$spec.deviceChange[0].device.backing.fileName = $isoName

	$vm.ReconfigVM_Task($spec)

	$winscript = "regedit /s windows_gos_timeout.reg"
	$linscript = "sudo /media/cdrom/linux_gos_timeout-install.sh"

	if($vm.Guest.OSFullName -match "Microsoft") {
			Invoke-VMScript -HostCredentials $esxcred -GuestCredentials -ScriptText $winscript
	}
	else if($vm.Guest.OSFullName -match "Linux") {
			Invoke-VMScript -HostCredentials $esxcred -GuestCredentials -ScriptText $linscript
	}
}

Back to work.

VMware Expert System with PowerCLI and Excel

This post is a writeup of a project for a master’s class in Decision Support Systems at Murray State.  This is my first dive into VMware PowerCLI aside from some one shots. All feedback is welcome.

Our Problems

Problem 1: Servers are not being virtualized due to a decentralized procurement process

A decentralized server procurement process presents many problems to an organization. There are many gains with standardizing OS/hardware platforms.

Problem 2: Servers are not being virtualized because knowledge is required to make “Virtualize/Don’t Virtualze” decision

The benefits of server virtualization are easy to explain and are a part of our culture. However, the organization has not adopted a “virtualize first” mentality. There is still a lack of stakeholder understanding with regards to virtualization.

Due to lack of knowledge, ROI is not maximized. This knowledge exists in two places – the virtual infrastructure itself and as tacit knowledge with the VMware administrator.

PROBLEM ANALYSIS

Problem 1: Servers are not being virtualized due to a decentralized procurement process
This problem is outside of the scope of the CIS645 class. We’re working on it.

Problem 2: Servers are not being virtualized because knowledge is required to make “Virtualize/Don’t Virtualze” decision

Problem 2 has two major parts.

CAPACITY – CAN OUR VIRTUAL INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT THIS APPLICATION?

This question has historically been answered heuristically with ball park figures. Manually gathering current storage and RAM capacity data too time consuming.

CANDIDACY – BASED ON SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND INDUSTRY KNOWLEDGE, IS VIRTUALIZATION SUITABLE FOR THIS APPLICATION?

This is the harder question. Typically you’ll hear consultants say “it depends”. Answering this question usually involves a phone call with the VMware administrator. The conversation is series of questions from the administrator to the stakeholder.

RECOMMENDATION

When the two questions have been answered, a recommendation of Virtualize/Don’t Virtualize is made. If a Virtualize decision is made, the VMware administrator must find the optimal storage unit to deploy to and coordinate the deployment with the stakeholder.

SOLUTION DESIGN

USER INTERFACE

The users of this system are already familiar with Excel and would prefer to utilize Excel’s familiarity and What-If scenario planning.

What if we added another 2TB of storage?
What if we upgraded our RAM?
What if we didn’t have to have the license dongle?

Excel quickly enables these questions to be answered. A normal ‘GUI’ application would take more time to develop and would not invite queries of an ad-hoc nature.

CAPACITY

Capacity data resides at several levels: the virtual machine itself, the host, and the data store. The data is put into Excel using VMware’s PowerCLI. PowerCLI is a Windows PowerShell snap-in that integrates with any VMware Virtual Infrastructure. Windows PowerShell also integrates nicely with Excel.
Here are the steps to capacity gathering with the VMware Expert System:

  • Open the Excel Spreadsheet
  • Clear previously gathered data
  • Connect to a vCenter Server
  • Gather datastore information
  • Gather host information
  • Gather virtual machine information
  • Write values to ‘Capacity’ Worksheet
  • Write values to ‘New Virtual Machine’ Worksheet
  • Save Excel Spreadsheet
  • Clean up and quit Excel

CANDIDACY

The user of the VMware Expert System will answer a series of questions to determine system candidacy. Through knowledge capture, the conversation with the VMware Administrator does not need to take place. The knowledge is generally accepted by a community of VMware experts.

RECOMMENDATION

After answering the capacity and candidacy questions, the user receives a final recommendation. The recommendation is only “Virtualize” if capacity is available and candidacy is met.

The interface also displays reasons why a machine is not suitable for virtualization to enable What-If analysis.

DECISION TREE

Modified from VI:OPS P2V Decision Tree

RUNNING THE VMWARE EXPERT SYSTEM

PREREQUISITES

STEPS TO RUN THE VMWARE EXPERT SYSTEM

  • Download and extract vmware-expert-system.zip
  • Rename launch.tab to launch.bat
  • Edit launch.bat, line 2
    • Substitute your path to updatespreadsheet.ps1 where you see “C:\users\%username%\Documents\cis645\Project\vmware_expert_system\updatespreadsheet.ps1”, make sure the path is in quotation marks
  • Edit updatespreadsheet.ps1, line 11
    • Substitute your path to vmware_expert_system.xlsm where you see “C:\users\%username%\Documents\cis645\Project\vmware_expert_system\vwmare_expert_system.xlsm”, make sure the path is in quotation marks
  • Run click ‘launch.bat’
  • A screen similar to this will appear:
  • Launch the spreadsheet “vmware_expert_system.xlsm” and enable macros
  • Enter system requirements
  • Press “Send Work Order”

EXAMPLE SYSTEM: NEW WEB SERVER

  • Enter the hostname: newwebserver
    • The hostname must not be already existing and must be a valid hostname (“The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)”)
  • Enter a functional contact: Andy Hill
  • Enter a staff contact: Andy Hill
  • Select an Operating System: Windows Server 2003
  • Enter a storage requirement: 20 GB
    • The minimum storage requirement must be >8 GB and less than the size of a maximum single disk
  • Enter a RAM requirement: 1024 MB
    • The minimum RAM requirement is 256MB and must be less than one host and still tolerant of a host failure
  • Number of Processors: 1
    • Must be numeric, greater than or equal to 1, less than or equal to 4
  • Number of NICs: 1
    • Must be numeric, greater than or equal to 1, less than or equal to 4
  • Average CPU utilization: 5%
    • Must be numeric, between 0 and 1, if 4 processors are used average utilization cannot exceed 50%
  • Average RAM utilization: 256 MB
    • Must not exceed 8GB
  • Average NIC utilization: 1 MBps
    • Must not exceed 100MBps
  • Maximum Disk IO: 10 MBps
    • Must not exceed 100MBps
  • Answer TRUE/FALSE to the following hardware components
    • Modems: FALSE
    • Fax Cards: FALSE
    • License Dongles: FALSE
    • Security Dongles: FALSE
    • Hardware Encryption: FALSE
  • Answer TRUE/FALSE to Vendor Support: TRUE
  • Recommendation: Virtualize!

ADD NEW SUPPORTED GUEST OS

VMware’s Guest OS Compatibility Guide (“VMware, Inc.”) is exhaustive and does not line up with Murray State University’s environment. The drop-down list is populated from a hidden worksheet within Excel. For our environment, we limited this drop down to Guests OSes which have regularly maintained templates.

To add, delete, or change an entry in the operating system list follow these steps:

  1. Toward the bottom of Excel, right click the current worksheet
  2. From the context menu, select “Unhide…”
  3. From the Unhide Window, Select ‘Supported Guest Operating Systems’ and press OK
  4. Navigate to the ‘Supported Guest Operating Systems’ Worksheet. Make changes Column A. Only changes in Column A will be reflected in the spreadsheet. Save your changes.

Future Considerations

Future versions of this project will include:
  • Support for advanced disk layouts
  • Get-Template feeding the ‘Supported Guest OS’ worksheet
  • 1 click ‘deploy from template’
  • Support for tiered storage
  • Graphs of compute resources by host and virtual machine

# VMware Expert System Capacity Gathering
# v0.2
# by Andy Hill
# https://virtualandy.wordpress.com

# gathering data for VMware capacity
$viserver = Read-Host "Enter a vCenter server";
Write-Host "Gathering Excel data...1/8"

$excel = new-object -comobject Excel.Application
# Edit this value to the location of your vmware_expert_system.xlsm
$excelfile = $excel.workbooks.open("C:\Users\andy.hill\Documents\cis645\Project\vmware_expert_system\vmware_expert_system.xlsm")
$worksheet = $excelfile.worksheets.item(3) # Select Capacity Worksheet

Write-Host "Clearing existing capacity data...2/8"
# Clear existing data
$worksheet.Range("A5:N65000").Clear() | out-null
$worksheet.cells.item(1,2) = $viserver

Write-Host "Connecting to $viserver, this may take a moment...3/8"
connect-viserver $viserver -erroraction stop -WarningAction SilentlyContinue | out-null

# datastore information
Write-Host "Gathering disk information...4/8"
$i = 5
$disks = get-datastore
foreach($disk in $disks) {
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 1) = $disk.name;
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 2) = $disk.freespaceMB;
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 3) = $disk.capacityMB;
	$i++;
}
$disk_count = $i;

$i = 5
Write-Host "Gathering host information...5/8"
# host information
Get-VMHost | %{Get-View $_.ID} | %{
	$esx = "" | select Name, NumCpuPackages, NumCpuCores, Hz, Memory
	$esx.NumCpuPackages = $_.Hardware.CpuInfo.NumCpuPackages
	$esx.NumCpuCores = $_.Hardware.CpuInfo.NumCpuCores
	$esx.Hz = $_.Hardware.CpuInfo.Hz
	$esx.Memory = $_.Hardware.MemorySize
	$esx.Name = $_.Name

	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 6) = $esx.Name
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 7) = $esx.NumCpuPackages
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 8) = $esx.NumCpuCores
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 9) = $esx.hz / 1000 / 1000
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 10) = $esx.memory / 1024 / 1024;
	$i++;
}
$host_count = $i;

# vm information
$i = 5
Write-Host "Gathering virtual machine information...6/8"

get-vm | % {
	$vm = "" | select name, MemoryMB
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 13) = $_.Name
	$worksheet.cells.item($i, 14) = $_.MemoryMB
	$i++;
}

# Create the totals and amount utilized
$worksheet.cells.item(($i+1),13) = "Total"
$worksheet.cells.item(($i+1),14) = "=sum(N6:N" + $i + ")"
$vm_count = $i;

Write-Host "Writing values to Excel Spreadsheet...7/8"
#add some formatting
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 2), 1) = "Datastore with most free space";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 3), 1) = "Memory (MB) Available";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 4), 1) = "Memory Utilization %";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 5), 1) = "Storage Available (GB)";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 6), 1) = "Storage Utilization %";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 7), 1) = "Most Storage Available on a datastore (GB)";

# add the formulas
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 2), 2) = "=INDEX((A5:A" + $disk_count + "),MATCH(MAX(B5:B" + $disk_count + "),B5:B" + $disk_count + ",0))";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 3), 2) = "=SUM(J5:J" + $host_count + ") - N" + ($vm_count+1);
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 4), 2) = "=N" + ($vm_count+1) + "/SUM(J5:J" + ($host_count-1) + ")"; # n-1 hosts for HA failover
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 5), 2) = "=SUM(B5:B" + $disk_count + ")/1024";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 6), 2) = "=1-SUM(B5:B" + $disk_count + ")/SUM(C5:C" + $disk_count + ")";
$worksheet.cells.item(($disk_count + 7), 2) = "=INDEX((B5:B" + $disk_count + "),MATCH(MAX(B5:B" + $disk_count + "),B5:B" + $disk_count + ",0))/1024";

Write-Host "Saving Excel Spreadsheet...8/8";
# Select main worksheet
$worksheet = $excelfile.worksheets.item(1);
# Update the 'new virtual machine' worksheet with capacity data
$worksheet.cells.item(8,4) = "=Capacity!B" + ($disk_count + 5) + "-'New Virtual Machine'!B8";
$worksheet.cells.item(8,7) = "=MAX(Capacity!B5:" + "B" + ($disk_count - 1) + ")/1024";
$worksheet.cells.item(9,4) = "=(Capacity!B" + ($disk_count +3) + ")/1024";
$worksheet.cells.item(29,2) = "=Capacity!B" + ($disk_count + 2);
$excel.activeworkbook.save();
$excel.quit();

iSCSI SAN performance woes with VMware ESX 3.5

We filed support requests with IBM and VMware and went through a very lengthy process without any results.

Each of our hosts had the following iSCSI HBAs:

  • QLA4010
  • QLA4050C

A while ago we found out QLA4010 is not on the ESX 3.5 HCL even though it runs with a legacy driver.

As our virtual environment grew we noticed storage performance lagging. This was particularly evident with our Oracle 10G Database server running our staging instance of Banner Operational Data Store. We were seeing 1.1 MB/sec and slower for disk writes.

We opened a case with VMware support and later with IBM support.  We provided lots of data to VMware and IBM while no one mentioned the unsupported HBA. No one at IBM mentioned it either. VMware support referred us to KB# 1006821 to test virtual machine storage I/O performance.

We ran HD Speed in a new VM mimicing the setup using RDM and using a dedicated LUN. Similar results.
We ran HD Speed on the same RDM on a physical machine and got 45 MB/sec.

All of our hosts had an entry like this in the logs (grep -i abort /var/log/vmkernel* | less)

vmkernel.36:Mon DD HH:ii:ss vmkernel: 29:02:31:16.863 cpu3:1061)LinSCSI: 3201: Abort failed for cmd with serial=541442, status=bad0001, retval=bad0001

Hundreds, if not thousands of these iSCSI aborts in the log files. We punted to IBM and they gave us the recommendation of running Host Utilities Kit. This optimizes HBA settings specific to IBM storage systems.

My recommendation ended up being two fold: Upgrade the ESX hosts because we were on an old build (95xxx) and replace the QLA4010 with a QLA4050C on each host.

Now that our ESX upgrade is complete we are seeing much better performance from our iSCSI storage.

ESXi Snapshots not showing in VI Client

Yesterday I made a mistake. We have a virtual machine set up to test Spacewalk which runs CentOS.

It has a virtual disk for this OS on datastore1 and a virtual disk for the data on datastore2. datastore1 had 11 gb free and datastore2 had 300 gb free. I snapshotted the VM, we did some work, and I committed the snapshot. Except it didn’t work. Now the machine won’t stay booted.I remembered reading something from Yellow-Bricks about disk space and snapshots. Oops. Since this VM was on an ESXi host, there was no service console commands to commit the snapshot.

This error popped up, and the VM would power down:

There is no more space for the redo log of VMNAME-000001.vmdk.

I freed up some space on datastore1, but I couldn’t find how to commit the snapshot. There were several -delta.vmdk files in the virtual machine’s folder on datastore1.

Solution: After freeing up some disk space, I created another snapshot from the VI Client. Then I immediately when to “Delete All”. This got rid of the orphaned snapshot as well as the newly created one.

AutoPager now works with VMTN and NetApp Technology Network sites

AutoPager is a Firefox extension which follows the “Next” links on lots of pages and loads them inline. If you’re already using the extension, go to AutoPager -> Update Setting -> Update Setting Online.

The authors just added VMTN forums and NetApp Technology Network to their supported sites. This means if you’re reading a long thread you don’t have to click next. You can just keep scrolling — the next page is loaded inline.

thread

It also works on thread lists.

threadlist-loading

This is a screenshot of the “Loading” indicator in the bottom left. Once you scroll so far, it automatically shows up, then fetches the next page.

threadlist

Restoring VMware Virtual Machines from NetApp Snapshots

In our organization, the storage administrator is completely separate from the VI Administrator. This process requires some coordination with the storage administrator. Here is our process for restoring a VM from our SAN snapshots. A lot of this information was gleamed from Scott Lowe’s posts on FlexClones.

Unfortunately, we do not have SMVI (the jaw dropping video demo is here) at this moment. It appears NetApp has made this process trivial with that application. This is how we’re making it work on a limited budget.

Step 0 – Determine Snapshot to clone from

Working with the VMware admin, determine which Snapshot to clone from based on timestamp and LUN

Step 1 – Create LUN Clone

  • Telnet to the filer
  • Run this command to create LUN clone – lun clone create /vol/volume_name/lun_clone_name -o noreserve -b /vol/volume_name/original_lun_name parent_snapshot_name
  • Verify new LUN is created using FilerView in a browser

Step 2 – Map clone LUN

  • Log into FilerView for the filer
  • In left column click on LUNS, then Manage
  • Click on the name of the new LUN clone
  • Click on Map LUN near the top
  • Click on Add Groups to Map, and add to appropriate group
  • Type a number (we typically use 99) into the box labeled LUN ID and click Apply

Step 3 – Enable Volume Resignature

  • Launch VirtualCenter
  • From VC, select a host
  • Select the configuration tab
  • Select advanced
  • Navigate to LVM
  • Change the value of LVM.EnableResignature to 1 (on, the default value is 0)

Step 4 – Rescan for the new LUN

  • From the Configuration tab on a selected host, Navigate to Storage Adapters
  • Select “Rescan”
  • The recovered VMFS datastore will appear with a name similar to “snap_*”
  • From here, there are two options:
    • Add the virtual machine to inventory and run from the recovered LUN
    • Copy the virtual machine’s folder to another LUN, then add to inventory
  • It is recommended that you copy the virtual machine’s folder to another LUN (non snap_*), and then add the recovered virtual machine to inventory.

Step 5 – Clean up

  • Disable LVM.EnableResignature – repeat step 1 of this document, but change the value back to 0.
  • Ensure all VMs running on the recovery LUN are powered off
  • From VC, select a host
  • Select the configuration tab
  • Select Storage
  • Select the recovery LUN and click Remove
  • Delete the LUN clone after VMware admin has finished removing

 

The Virtual Machine will be brought up as if it went down from a “dirty” shutdown. In a lot of cases, this is okay. For write intensive applications (like databases) you may have to go a few steps farther in restoring functionality.

PlanetV12n: My VMware RSS Feed Wish List

Here’s my PlanetV12n Wish List (in no particular order):

  1. Provide feed customization. Strategy/Administration/Business Case/etc. Virtualization has turned into an extremely broad topic. Too much noise in the feed reader is a loss of value to PlanetV12n.
  2. Provide more virtualization related feeds from vendors like EMC, NetApp, Dell, and IBM.
  3. Require full articles. If there is resistance on this, just politely remind publishers that advertising is available via RSS
  4. Give us the option of having OPML output of PlanetV12n. Personally, I would prefer OPML-only, it gives users more control over what feeds they want to see. OPML can be imported into almost any feed reader. Lots of the bloggers on PlanetV12n are very interested in their subscriber statistics. Being published on PlanetV12n drives those numbers down.

My ideal setup for PlanetV12n, a form to generate an OPML file I can add to Google Reader. VMware’s site is full of these forms, so adding another can’t be that bad right? ;-)

Select your role within IT: (checkboxes) Business / Strategy / Administration / Performance / Disaster Recovery / Evangelist / etc.

Tell us about your VMware Products: (checkboxes) ESX / ESXi / Workstation / Fusion / etc

Tell us about your vendors: IBM / Dell / NetApp / EMC / etc

… the list goes on. This could be useful for VMware’s marketers as well as end users.

VMware Knowledge Resources for the Beginner VI Administrator

I have no problem making it clear I’m relatively new to the virtual world. That doesn’t mean you can’t learn fast.

Here are a few tools I’ve used to become a better VI Administrator:

  1. Training. Pros: Certified knowledge from the source. We hosted a VMware Jumpstart, and that training is without a doubt my catalyst into the rest of the virtual world. Training teaches you how to talk the talk so that other sources of knowledge are useful. Cons: Cost (not just upfront $$, but time cost).
  2. Web Sites to Search. Once you take on the new role, you need to do a considerable amount of reading. Pros: Low cost (aside from time) and can have a particularly high benefit. Cons: Lots of noise. Trouble distinguishing between good and bad sources.
    • VMTN
    • Google Reader and Planet V12n – I may have to write a separate post about my thoughts on V12n, but for the most part it is useful
    • VMware Knowledge Base
    • Google and FoxItReader – VMware’s website can be tedious to use, so using some operators in Google makes it a little more bearable for instance… site:vmware.com filetype:pdf. FoxItReader makes those PDF’s tolerable compared to Adobe Reader – and it has tabs!
    • Free VMworld Videos from 2007 which are still applicable today
  3. “Social” Media. I’m not including VMTN because I rarely post to it. The items below have been useful from an interactive standpoint — not just one sided conversations. There are similar pros and cons to this as websites — e.g., low cost vs. information overload and finding a reputable source.
    • #vmware IRC channel on freenode
    • Twitter – most of the bloggers from PlanetV12 also have twitter accounts, they post when products are released and can also provide quick @replies to your questions
  4. VMware Gold Support Pros: Very thorough, certified support. I am very happy with the support we’ve received from VMware. After I’ve exhausted Google, Social Media, etc., VMware Support has come through for us several times. Cons: Cost. Time being on hold and turnaround times.

RHEL P2V: Old Way and New Way

Most of this was taken from this site: http://conshell.net/wiki/index.php/Linux_P2V

Up front work

Determine exactly what you’re doing, and the resources you’ll need on the VMware side.

as root:

sfdisk -s
/dev/hda: 39070080
total: 39070080 blocks

To find the size in GB, divide by 1024 twice.
39070080/1024/1024 = 37.260 GB

Partition layout – know exactly the partitions, sizes and FS types. This can be gleaned from the output of `fdisk -l /dev/sda` and the content of /etc/fstab.

Disk types – IDE? SATA?

Downtime – Unfortunately, your source system must be down for the duration of the P2V process.

Have a copy of the system rescue CD ready. Boot the source system to it.

On the source system:
Back up the kernel’s ramdisk
cp /boot/initrd-`uname -r`.img /root/`uname -r`.bak
Make a new ramdisk with VMware-friendly RHEL scsi drivers
mkinitrd -v -f –with=mptscsih /boot/initrd-`uname -r`.img `uname -r`

This command will make SCSI drivers that VMware needs to use available to RHEL at boot time. This should not affect the source system.

md5sum /dev/sda – record the last six characters of the output. This generates a fingerprint used to verify integrity at the end.

On the target system:

Create a new VM
OS: Linux (RHEL 4/5)
Disk slightly larger than source system
NIC: upgrade to VMware tools
CDROM: System Rescue CD ISO
Boot the system, make sure the disks are recognized (sfdisk -s). Verify network is up with ifconfig eth0.

Disk Cloning

This part takes a while. Boot both systems to the system rescue CD. Try making a benchmark.

Make a 1 GB File on the source system, set the target to prepare for an incoming transmission:

Source: dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1024 count=1048576
Target: nc -l -p 9001 | dd of=/dev/sda
Write down the start time.
Source: dd if=bigfile | nc 9001
Write down the finish time.
Estimate accordingly. (e.g., 20 gb would be at least 20 times longer)
For the “real” copy, remember you are copying a device to a device.

Target:

nc -l -p 9001 | dd of=/dev/sda
Source:

dd if=/dev/sda | nc 9001
There may be differing builds of nc, so your mileage may vary regarding the switches for ports. use nc –help to find out which version of the rescue CD. To gauge how long this would take you may want to try using pipe viewer.

One the source machine, if you need it to boot again you may need to run this command:
mv /root/`uname -r`.bak /boot/initrd-`uname -r`.img

New Way
VMware vCenter Converter 4.0 supports RHEL P2V. Win.

VMware’s VCP Certification, my $0.02

It started with Eric Siebert’s open letter to VMware making this suggestion:

6. Relax the VMware Certified Professional (VCP) certification requirements. I shouldn’t have to take a class to become a VCP, if I have the knowledge and experience to pass the VCP exam that should be enough. Many qualified people can’t afford to take a class just so they can take the test.

Amen. Then Dave Lawrence, the VMguy responded, making a few points about the certification requirements.

One of my readers wrote in (Thanks Jay!) and disagreed with this one and I do as well. My reader, Jay, reminded me of the integrity of the exam and how that must be maintained. He told me how VMware should keep it the way it is to avoid “good test takers”. He also reminded me of the girl who got her MCP at age 9 . Sheesh, really!?! (and I failed my first one, that makes me feel good.)

Did any company hire the 9 year old girl who got her MCP? Probably not.

Is the MCP still a worthwhile certifications? Do employers still value it? Yes & yes.

He summarizes (emphasis his):

Your certification should be a challenge in the form of effort, know how and experience. I think that VMware wants to be certain that the test takers have actually seen and used the product at least once. Perhaps the MCP should do the same so 4th graders are not getting their certifications.

Training != Real Experience. How is this enhancing the VCP certification’s value?

I don’t have the money to pay for the class myself right now. It’s difficult to justify the cost to my employer since we already purchased a jumpstart where we installed and configured VI3. My employer can comp the exam costs, but I can’t take it without additional training that I can’t justify.

If the experience has to be there to create value in the VCP program, why does it have to be such a specific kind?

My correspondence with VMware:

Hello,
I have attended a training session entitled “VMware Jumpstart” – does this qualify me to take the VCP exam?

VMware’s response:

Hi Andy,

The jumpstart class is not a VCP qualifying class. Only the classes listed below meet the requirement.

1. VI 3: Install and Configure

2. VI 3: Deploy Secure and Analyze

3. VI 3: Fast Track

Without completion of one of these classes you will not be certified. Class must be taken with VMware or one of VMware’s authorized training partners to be counted. All authorized class can be found at http://www.vmware.com/education.

Boo, VMware. Boo. That’s my $0.02 since I don’t have at least $3000 available to qualify for the VCP.

False Alarms with Virtual Center 2.5

Since I enabled alarms in VirtualCenter on 10/07/2008 we have encountered 14 seperate false alarms regarding host connectivity.

Here’s the alarm:

Target: hostname.goes.here

Old Status: Green
New Status: Red

Current value:
Host connection state – (State = Not responding)

Alarm: Host connection state
([Red State Is Equal To notResponding])

Description:
Alarm Host connection state on hostname.goes.here changed from Green to Red

Here’s what we went through with support.

  • Sending Diagnostics from VC
  • Found out we are running an unsupported HBA (QLA4010’s are not supported in ESX 3.5, but in ESX 3) … this was frustrating because we have seen that they will work with ESX 3.5 elsewhere from VMware
  • Advised to up the Service Console RAM to 800 MB from 272 MB

We haven’t been seeing false alarms since.

Our Storage Problem

We had some storage issues. We still have some storage issues, but it’s getting better. Here’s what we’ve fixed:

  • Overbooked storage
  • Storage Switch Failure Tolerance
  • Adapter Failure Tolerance

 

Overbooked Storage Units

The most immediate issue that could be addressed was the storage bloat. This did not require additional hardware. Previously, our storage allocated for VMware was as follows:

  • VMFSLun1 (600 GB)
  • VMFSLun2 (900 GB)

All 30 virtual machines the university ran (46 individual virtual hard disks) were running on two LUNs. Through collaboration with the SAN administrator, VMware’s Storage vMotion technology, and the SVMotion Plugin[3], the LUNs were balanced as much as possible without the addition of new hardware. The new storage is laid out as follows, per NetApp & VMware recommendations [1] [2]:

  • VMFSLun1 (300 GB – reallocated from old VMFSLun1)
  • VMFSLun2 (300 GB – reallocated from old VMFSLun1)
  • VMFSLun3 (300 GB – reallocated from old VMFSLun2)
  • VMFSLun4 (300 GB – reallocated from old VMFSLun2)
  • VMFSLun5 (300 GB – reallocated from old VMFSLun2)
  • Templates_and_ISOs (50 GB – new)
  • VMFSLun6 (300 GB – new)

We reorganized their existing allocated storage (1500 GB) into a more optimized layout. Additionally, a 50 GB LUN was added (Templates_and_ISOs) for organizational purposes. The need for additional storage capacity was identified and VMFSLun6 was created with existing iSCSI storage.

Switch and Adapter Fault Tolerance

During the procurement process, Information Systems staff planned to implement the new hardware. We then created a plan.

The existing storage setup had 3 hosts, 30 virtual machines (46 virtual disks) attached to two LUNs with one host based adapter (HBA) and one path. The filers are redundant in the sense that they are clustered for IP takeover, but there were two additional points of failure:

  • If a host’s HBA failed, the VMs would be unavailable and data would be lost.
  • If the switch the any of the cluster’s HBAs are connected to failed, all virtual machine disks would be unavailable and all virtual machines would likely incur data loss.

Figure 1.1 – Before the upgrade, HBA fault tolerance diagram

The new storage adapter fault tolerance plan had two major goals: tolerance of a switch failure and tolerance of a storage adapter failure. Planning to tolerate switch failure was straightforward: attach the additional HBA into another switch. Planning to tolerate HBA failure for a given LUN was handled with VMware’s Virtual Infrastructure Client.

Managing Paths within VI Client.

After we received the new HBAs, each host was brought down with no downtime. The new HBAs were placed in the hosts, and connected to the additional switches. The hosts were brought back up and primary paths were set in the VI Client per LUN.

Diagram of our Virtual Infrastructure showing HBA and switch fault tolerance

Storage Performance

Multiple paths to LUNs serves as an important point which will also help us lessen LUN contention and increase IO performance. Now that there are two available paths for each LUN, the “hot” paths can be evenly split between HBAs, increasing the total throughput per HBA. Previously, we had all LUN traffic travel through a single point (HBA 1), and each virtual disk per LUN had to be accommodated.

Our previous LUN / path layout

With the additional path along with the better balanced LUNs (see “Overbooked Storage”) the new structure has six LUNs, but only 3 being used by each HBA. This layout means less total traffic through each HBA per LUN.

 

Our Current Storage Layout, demonstrating multiple paths and lower LUN contention

 

[1] “SAN System Design and Deployment Guide”, VMware
http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/772

[2] “NetApp and VMware Virtual Infrastructure 3 Storage Best Practices”, NetApp; page 11
http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3428.pdf

[3] “VI Plug-in – SVMotion”, Schley Andrew Kutz
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=228535

Chargeback: The Value Added Pitch

Our chargeback policy for virtual machines was not clearly defined. To encourage adoption, the provisioning fee for a virtual machine was $500 regardless of system requirements. In lieu of a host being added and other considerable investments being made hardware, the chargeback policy needed to be revised. Virtual Machines within our matured Virtual Infrastructure cost more to provide but add a considerable amount of value.

After a bit of reading at vmMBA and watching BM15 Managing Chargeback with VMware Infrastructure 3 from VMworld 2007 we decided to go with a tiered chargeback method. The chargeback method has three tiers – low, middle, and high. The lowest tier is designed to be cheapest by far to encourage adoption on a larger scale. Our goal is to instill the confidence we have in our virtual infrastructure to our users.

Feature

Physical System

Virtual Machine

Redundant Power

Standard in higher-tier servers, lower-tier servers ~$100

Standard on hosts

Redundant CPU

Duplicate hardware required

Through multiple hosts and high availability

Redundant RAM

Duplicate hardware required

Through multiple hosts and high availability

Redundant Storage

Not required; additional costs for RAID levels or multiple storage adapters (HBAs)

Standard through multiple HBAs, SAN switch redundancy, SAN RAID levels

Redundant Network

Standard in higher-tier servers; switch redundancy not always implemented

Through multiple hosts, multiple NICs, & multiple switches

Warranty

Optional – increases total cost between $350-$1500

Standard on hosts

System Lifetime

Server MTBF, then reordered, and moved (With an outage)

N/A

Testability

Risky, requires downtime or “test” hardware

Live servers can be placed into snapshot mode; Local copies can also be downloaded for extensive tests

Hardware Maintenance

Outage/Maintenance Windows Required

Transparent to users via vMotion

Recoverability

File level only, requires OS & application reloads

File level and Image level

Illustration of added value with virtual machines

Let’s take this a step further with a Dell server. Quotes generated with the using Dell Higher Education website.

The server I will be using is the PowerEdge 2970. Base cost: $5,330.

Feature

Physical System

Virtual Machine

Redundant Power

Added Cost: $0

Included.

Redundant CPU

Duplicate hardware required. Added Cost: $5,330

Included.

Redundant RAM

Included in the above duplicate hardware. Requires downtime to replace.

Included.

Redundant Storage

RAID 5 Standard

Cost: 0

Included.

Redundant Network

Standard; must instruct staff to use different switches

Added Cost: $0

Included.

Warranty

3 year warranty standard

Added Cost: $0

Included.

Total

($5,330 + $5,330) = $10,660

 

 

This is probably a mid to high tier VM, which would depend on disk IO rates and load. I could see charging anywhere from $3,000-$4,500 for this VM. I will eventually post the details on how that number was derived.

Total value added: ($10,660 – $4,500) = $6,160. That’s the high estimate on what would be charged. That’s not even including the depreciation that the server would incur each year. Or the value added from faster recovery times with VMware Consolidated Backup or SAN based snapshots. Or the value added from being able to deploy a virtual machine much faster than acquire physical equipment. Or the zero downtime VMware hosts can have with hardware maintenance via vMotion. Or the downtime that was not incurred because virtual machines have ability to be placed in snapshot mode, protecting from potentially disruptive changes.

Of course, this is all just talk unless you to have an SLA to back the value added claims up. In your SLA it is important to note that high availability with CPU/RAM is not fault tolerance. That’s coming soon, but VMware Fault Tolerance has not hit the market yet. While the SLA cannot guarantee zero downtime, an SLA backed by VMware HA can guarantee much less downtime than a non clustered physical system.

How We Found Our Virtual Networking Mojo

Switch and Network Adapter Fault Tolerance

Each of the VMware ESX hosts that we had were equipped with dual Network Adapters (NICs). With a typical physical server, two NICs could demonstrate fault tolerance. However, for ESX hosts the dual NIC is not fault tolerant. VMware ESX has three major types of traffic:

  1. VMkernel – used for vMotion, which allows host downtime without an interruption of service
  2. Service Console – initiates vMotion, serves as the primary venue of managing Virtual Machines
  3. VM Traffic – each individual virtual machine’s traffic, e.g., a web server’s incoming /outgoing requests

Our previous setup had significant points of failure:

  • If one NIC failed there would be complete service interruption.
    • If VMNIC0 failed, the interruption is slightly more controllable as it could be scheduled even though the virtual machines would not be manageable.
    • If VMNIC1 failed, all virtual machine traffic would be unexpectedly interrupted.
  • If the physical switch failed there would be an unscheduled complete service interruption.

Our old VMware Networking setup, no NIC/switch redundancy

 

The plan was to purchase an additional quad port NIC to remedy the NIC redundancy issue. With the additional 4 ports, the three types of traffic could have two dedicated ports. This setup is fault tolerant for NICs with each of the three traffic types. It’s taking the Cisco ESX Hosts with 4 NICs (page 62) to the next level. To fix the switch redundancy problem, the NICs are evenly split across two switches, per traffic type.

Networking setup demonstrating switch/NIC redundancy

 

Networking Performance

With the previous setup, we had an average of 7.5 VM’s going through one NIC per host. The NICs were being overused. Users were complaining of slow network performance. We implemented NIC teaming, while being afforded failover with favorable results.

cacti

Cacti Diagram showing before and after on an ESX host

In the above pic, a drastic decrease in utilization is shown after Week 32. This demonstrates the decrease in stress on the NIC that was being over utilized.